VL logo interarb logo   CLOUT
  index.

Case 233: MAL 35(1); 36(1)(b)(ii)

Zimbabwe: Harare High Court (Judge Chatikobo); Judgment No. HH-133-97

10 July and 20 August 1997

Durco (Pvt) Ltd v. Dajen (Pvt) Ltd

Original in English

Published in English in 1997(2) Zimbabwe Law Reports 199 (Harare)

Two parties, a grain producer and a miller, had submitted their dispute to a single arbitrator which resulted in an award in favour of the miller. As a third party was involved who had not been a party to the arbitration, it was feared that further proceedings might ensue. Accordingly, it was felt to be in the interests of all concerned to submit to a second arbitration which would be binding on all three parties.

The second arbitration, before a panel of three arbitrators, however, resulted in an award against the miller. The miller refused to comply with the second award and the grain producer applied to the High Court for its recognition and enforcement under article 35 MAL. The miller opposed the award on the grounds that it would be contrary to public policy to enforce the award in terms of article 36(1)(b)(ii) MAL, contending that since there was already an award it would offend the principle of finality in arbitration to enforce the second award.

The court held that, by agreeing to submit to a second arbitration, the miller had waived its rights to finality of the first award. Accordingly, the miller was now bound by the second award and the court ordered that it should be recognised and enforced. The miller appealed (see CLOUT case no. 234) to the Supreme Court.

 


From the UNITED NATIONS Document: "General Assembly: Distr. GENERAL: A/CN.9/SER.C/ABSTRACTS/1: of, 22 February 1999. Original : ENGLISH."

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
CASE LAW ON UNCITRAL TEXTS (CLOUT)
Abstracts of cases

     This compilation of abstracts forms part of the system for collecting and disseminating information on court decisions and arbitral awards relating to Conventions and Model Laws that have emanated from the work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Information about the features of that system and about its use is provided in the User Guide (A/CN.9/SER.C/GUIDE/1).

     The abstracts have been prepared by national correspondents designated by their Governments. It should be noted that neither the national correspondents nor anyone else directly or indirectly involved in the operation of the system assumes any responsibility for any error or omission or other deficiency.

__________

Copyright © United Nations 1999

     All rights reserved.

Reproduced on this web site (www.interarb.com) with the kind permission of the United Nations, New York.
Database, typography, layout, etc. © interarb, 1999.