VL logo interarb logo   CLOUT
  index.

Case 34: MAL 8

Canada: Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division (Joyal J.)

30 September 1992 and 9 October 1992 (identical decisions)

Miramichi Pulp and Paper Inc. v. Canadian Pacific Bulk Ship Services Ltd.

Original in English and French

Unpublished

While the Federal Court possesses some permissive jurisdiction over the granting of stays of proceedings, strong reasons are required to overcome the assumption that contracts must be respected and, therefore, article 8 MAL must operate.

The parties entered into a charter-party agreement whereby any dispute would be referred to arbitration in London. A dispute arose and court proceedings were commenced. A stay of these proceedings was granted by the Senior Prothonotary. This decision was appealed.

The court noted the mandatory nature of article 8 MAL (enacted by the Commercial Arbitration Act, Revised Statutes of Canada 1985, c.C-34.6) which requires the court to grant a stay of proceedings and refer matters to arbitration where certain conditions are met. The court also noted the permissive jurisdiction in s. 50 of the Federal Court Act, Revised Statutes of Canada 1985, c.F-7 which allows the Federal Court to grant stays of proceedings in the interest of justice. The court found that the interest of justice generally dictated that contractual agreements be upheld. In order to overcome this assumption, strong reasons are required. The court found that no such strong reasons existed in this case and upheld the decision of the Senior Prothonotary granting the stay.


Additional Information published in later CLOUT issue (on "9 February 2000"):

Abstract published in English: [1995] Model Arbitration Law Quarterly Reports, Vol. 1, issue 4, 55

Text of the court decision published in English: [1995] Model Arbitration Law Quarterly Reports, Vol. 1, issue 4, 58


From the UNITED NATIONS Document: "General Assembly: Distr. GENERAL: A/CN.9/SER.C/ABSTRACTS/2: of, 4 November 1993. Original : ENGLISH."

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
CASE LAW ON UNCITRAL TEXTS (CLOUT)
Abstracts of cases

     This compilation of abstracts forms part of the system for collecting and disseminating information on court decisions and arbitral awards relating to Conventions and Model Laws that have emanated from the work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Information about the features of that system and about its use is provided in the User Guide (A/CN.9/SER.C/GUIDE/1).

     The abstracts have been prepared by national correspondents designated by their Governments. It should be noted that neither the national correspondents nor anyone else directly or indirectly involved in the operation of the system assumes any responsibility for any error or omission or other deficiency.

__________

Copyright © United Nations 1993

     All rights reserved.

Reproduced on this web site (www.interarb.com) with the kind permission of the United Nations, New York.
Database, typography, layout, etc. © interarb, 1999.